SP-2002-06: Review the Site Plan for Suzy’s Candles
and Accessories at 1641 N. Andover Road. Don Kimble presented information for the applicant on the proposed
project. Mr. Kimble stated that this application will complete this parcel.
Mr. Kimble reviewed the site plan with the Committee. Mr. Kimble stated that
the building will be 30’x60’ and be similar in construction and looks to the
buildings on either side, north or south, of this building. Mr. Kimble stated
that regarding the grade everything slopes to the existing driveway to the
south of this property to the driveway that this building will share with the
existing building. Mr. Kimble stated that they propose to put a berm and Pin
Oak in the front of the building to screen the parking from the street. Mr.
Kimble stated that there was no signage or graphic recommendations at this
time and that he and his client will come back to the Committee when they
have this decided. Mr. Kimble stated that the lights from the building eaves
will light the parking, not light poles.
Gary Israel asked about the lawn mowing trailer that
sits out on the property. Mr. Kimble stated that will not be sitting there
when this building is complete. Gary Israel asked why there was not a
sidewalk in the front of the building. Don Kimble stated thee will be parking
blocks to protect the building. Mr. Kimble stated this is a supply store with
a side entrance. Mr. Israel asked where the air conditioning was located. Mr.
Kimble stated the furnace is inside and the air conditioner is on one and the
outside and they are waiting on the bids to be returned to decide the exact
location. Two alternatives were shown on the plan. Mr. Kimble stated that the
trash is to be contained in the building and taken out on pick-up day.
Charley Lewis voiced concern over the metal building
controversy. Ms. Lewis stated that this metal building will fit well there,
as it is similar to what is existing there. Doug Allison agreed with Charley
Lewis.
Shawn King asked if the landscaping will have a
sprinkler system. Mr. Kimble stated the front would have a sprinkler system.
Mr. Kimble stated that he and his client feel this
building as proposed is the correct architectural fell for the context for
this area. He stated that he feels the berming and no parking out front will
allow for the metal building.
Shawn King stated he thinks this building will blend
in with the other buildings. Larry Crouse agreed, however he doesn’t like the
pin Oak and suggests they plant a Shumard oak, which likes our soil
conditions. Doug Allison asked how far the porch can hang over the setback.
Les Mangus stated the porch can hang 3’ over the setback line.
There was general discussion regarding the size of
the driveway.
Doug Allison asked if the proposed building will
match the existing buildings. Mr. Kimble stated it will because they are
buying the material from the same supplier, it will have the same texture,
same ribs and same coloring.
There was general discussion regarding metal
buildings. Larry Crouse and Shawn King feel the metal building would be fine
in this location. Gary Israel, Doug Allison and Charley Lewis would all like
to see some other surface on the building.
Gary Israel made a motion to send this site plan
back to the client and have the client change the look of the building to
anything but the metal The client is also to change from a Pin Oak to any
other oak. Charley Lewis seconded the motion.
There was discussion regarding the motion. Gary
Israel suggested the front be brick, stone, stucco, anything but metal. Doug
Allison asked if there were any time concerns. Mr. Kimble stated if this is
approved tonight they are ready to get a building permit as soon as possible.
Mr. Kimble stated if the vote is against the plan he would like 5 minutes
with his client.
The vote on the motion was 3/2 with Shawn King and
Larry Crouse opposed.
|